Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SciTECO


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

SciTECO

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Zero evidence of coverage in reliable sources. — swpb T 13:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — swpb T 13:37, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 22:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   06:33, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - well-written article, but there a zero references, let alone any authoritative references. Nothing suggests that this subject is actually notable.--Rpclod (talk) 23:51, 21 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.