Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ScienCell Laboratories


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  11:13, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

ScienCell Laboratories

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NCORP. Sources that are in the article either do not mention the company at all or only mention it in passing, or fail WP:CORPDEPTH. I could not find any additional significant coverage. shoy (reactions) 13:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 13:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 13:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 13:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Can't find anything more than a passing mention. Kingofaces43 (talk) 18:23, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I also can't find anything beyond passing mentions, even on the company's list of coverage on their site.[] I know nothing about neural stem cell research, but it seems that if being the first company in the world to freeze them was a bigger deal, we'd see some mention of this at Neural stem cell. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  00:47, 2 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.