Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science Made Fun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 18:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Science Made Fun

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable website. Although there seem to be a lot of google hits, I don't think any of them could be counted as reliable, third party, non trivial, published sources. I may be wrong- delete unless notability is established. J Milburn 22:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, I'm not finding anything that would help this site pass WP:WEB, but if I'm missing something, I'd be glad to see a source. -FisherQueen (Talk) 22:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, This article conforms to the section of the WP:WEB that states "This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites of similar reliability to published works, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations" Science Made Fun has been featured in the Planet Science newsletter, this is run by NESTA, a highly respected organisation for innovation (once the back issues are updated, I will provide a link to back up this claim). It has also been a featured podcast of Podbean.com and the 'Dinosaurs' podcast was a weekly pick. Colin stuart 10:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: If we can have some links, that would be great. I couldn't find any... J Milburn 10:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.