Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientific journalism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Science journalism. Liz Read! Talk! 04:33, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Scientific journalism

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails notability requirements. Relies on two media sources and an academic source from ten years ago, a third media source fails verification, and two sections have no citations. No ongoing notability or relevance. Seems like it was only ever known because of one person and never widely used Softlemonades (talk) 16:54, 13 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup/expand. Almost a million Google results for the phrase.  Andre🚐 00:05, 14 August 2022 (UTC) Merge/redirect to science journalism Andre🚐 01:03, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * , the specific source you cite is a 1948 piece that discusses journalism focused on Science rather than Julian Assange's concept. As noted on the top of the article nominated for deletion, the article nominated for deletion "Scientific journalism" is not to be confused with "Science journalism", which is a different concept altogether. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:59, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah, alright, I'll change mine to Merge/Redirect on that basis. Andre🚐 01:03, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Id agree that a Redirect could be appropriate since most people coming to Wikipedia are thinking of Science journalism and probably arent coming for Assanges concept. Softlemonades (talk) 14:47, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete and redirect the title to Science journalism. BD2412  T 01:20, 21 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.