Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientific opinion on climate change


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Keep. TeaDrinker (talk) 00:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Scientific opinion on climate change

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

If views opposing those expressed in one article are unsuitable for publication on Wikipedia, then logically those views expressed in the article are also unsuitable for publication on Wikipedia. T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  TALK 00:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's a useful article, extremely well sourced, and I don't even see an argument from the nominator. The nomination seems to the WP:POINTy, anyways. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 00:14, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep No rationale for deletion stated. Townlake (talk) 00:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep This is not a valid deletion reason.  (The article cited as "opposing" hasn't even been deleted, merely nominated for deletion.)  Dawn Bard (talk) 00:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * It certainly is a valid reason. Without the other article you don't have NPOV on Wiki regarding this topic.  Will you be posting an identical opinion at the opposing article?-- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  TALK 00:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Opposing views being wrongly blocked is not a valid reason for deletion. In this case the opposing views are not relevant as the scientific consensus is defined by what we can find in the peer reviewed literature and not on Senator Inhofe's blog. Count Iblis (talk) 00:40, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Apparently the nomination is based on WP:POINT, and it doesn't give a rationale for deletion. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 00:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.