Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientifik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Scientifik

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

non-notable rapper, who despite the claims of being "a slept on gem" is unsupported by RS. CUPIDICAE💕 13:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Massachusetts,  and New York.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:21, 17 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Removed. Thanks for the notice! I do not realize most of these until I look it from another view the next day. If there is anything more that I am not noticing promotional, please show. Vastcast (talk) 15:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: A fringe nonentity sourced from obscure websites; utter failure of the GNG and WP:BIO.   Ravenswing     19:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.