Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientillion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Scientillion

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. A web search reveals no RS coverage. Article created by an SPA. Rentier (talk) 18:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - May be WP:TOOSOON. There currently isn't enough independent coverage to merit an article. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Ajpolino (talk) 19:59, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just commercial blurb. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete - Agree that this looks like it could be WP:TOOSOON. --  Dane talk  03:06, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Do not delete - I can confirm that the database the article is about is actually is useful since I am using it myself for my daily research and used it a lot for writing my PHD thesis. So I think it should stay. However, it might be extended a bit.| talk ]]  14:06, 13 December 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.20.196.72 (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.