Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientrix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete G11. SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:27, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Scientrix

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Originally prodded as "not clear what exactly the product is. Certainly absolutely no evidence of notability" Creator removed prod & changed a few words - but the original prod hasn't been resolved. Skier Dude ( talk ) 19:18, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as unambiguous advertising This is a "concept(tm)" article written as a standin for the company, which is bolded in the writing. This meets several speedy delete criteria. Miami33139 (talk) 19:44, 26 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Blatant advertising, absolutely 0 evidence of notability. LoudHowie (talk) 20:38, 26 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per G11. --Alan (talk) 20:56, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Either OR or spam. Possibly even both. It's a 'new innovation'. Apart from difficulties with 'old innovations', that militates against notability and whispers 'spammmmmm'. Peridon (talk) 21:48, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.