Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scifer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete.  MBisanz  talk 17:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Scifer
Appears to promote the author's algorithm/implementation, nothing to establish notability. "Compression to unity"? - appears to claim that it could compress wikipedia to a single character. TrulyBlue (talk) 08:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable software. The fact that it claims something impossible isn't an argument for deletion on its own, but it is certainly a reason the software isn't notable - it's trivially provable that it can't do what it claims. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 09:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable. It's basically an advert, no apprent ghits, and there's no indication that the software is actually in use by any major companies. CultureDrone (talk) 11:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hang On (Author) - "Compression to unity" is misunderstood "Unity is not single character". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Senthil ucl (talk • contribs) 17:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete G11 for advertising and no claim to notability. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 19:21, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if it was the best thing since peanut butter, it's not a notable: hardly a google hit . Equendil Talk 22:16, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Compress to unity (or less) and replace with this NASA rocket-borne experiment. No Ghits to speak of. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:02, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * (author) I am aware of NASA Project and also Scifer project on archaeological work on NAGAS .The name reference is coincidental .I have got timestamps of scifer which predates almost 7-8 years.Universal Common Logic claims unity and not Scifer.Scifer is based on it.Query Universal Common Logic in google or yahoo or live and it would take to scifer site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Senthil ucl (talk • contribs) 04:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.