Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scions of Eden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Scions of Eden

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A possible WP:HOAX, this book fails all criteria for WP:BK guidelines. No references are provided other than the author's on-line resume. All searches for the ISBN number (including the WorldCat) find nothing. The supposed publisher is a government imprint that does not publish fiction and shows no record for this book. — Cactus Writer |   needles  06:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  — —  Cactus Writer |   needles  06:56, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. The summary of a plot of a book with nothing to support its notability. 99.178.163.130 (talk) 03:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete this hoax. A Google News Archive search and a Google search return no sources to establish this book's existence. Cunard (talk) 17:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom -- the state-owned imprint was highly suspicious. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 01:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. Edward321 (talk) 13:19, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.