Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scissors for Cutting Merzbow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Merzbow discography. (non-admin closure) Lugnuts ping  18:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Scissors for Cutting Merzbow

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Can find no independent coverage for this album, does not meet WP:NALBUMS OR WP:GNG J04n(talk page) 12:43, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 12:43, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 12:43, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Merzbow discography per WP:BEFORE #4.  Lugnuts  (talk) 13:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment from nom: I am happy to withdraw nomination for redirect. J04n(talk page) 15:07, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Merzbow discography as per comments above. --DAJF (talk) 15:09, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Merzbow discography... also as per comments above. I have come across many articles for albums by Merzbow, often when working on requests for cover images through the Albums project. This artist has a very long history and a beefy discography (239 studio albums!!!), but information and artwork for his many releases is largely absent in the English-speaking world because they haven't broken out of Japan very much. Still notable though. For now the discography is the best place for the sketchy info available on the various albums. Doomsdayer520  (Talk|Contribs) 17:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree completly with Doomsdayer. All Merzbow releases are notable, and in cases like this, they can be redirected as a likely search-term. Of course if references are found at a future date, there's no reason why not to restore the article from a redirect.  Lugnuts  (talk) 18:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.