Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scone (category theory)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep and move to Freyd Cover. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:36, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Scone (category theory)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Sources that mention this define it directly rather than being secondary sources mentioning other sources defining the term. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:05, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Rename to "Freyd Cover" - there seems to be enough coverage of that to justify an article. Delete this is far too specific for WIkipedia.  discusses it, so it's not complete nonsense, but the article as-written is basically nonsensical. Power~enwiki (talk) 02:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep, but move to "Freyd Cover" -- as this seems to be the more standard term for this. The article certainly needs some improvement, but there seems to be enough out there that this could just remain a short article.  --Deacon Vorbis (talk) 14:03, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep/rename to Freyd Cover, which is currently a redirect to this article. This is a common enough concept in category theory. Smmurphy(Talk) 17:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.