Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scooby-Doo! Stage Fright


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 19:36, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Scooby-Doo! Stage Fright

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Film doesn't have stand-alone notability; would recommend a redirect and not deletion BOVINEBOY 2008 12:16, 31 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep This film easily passes WP:GNG, and i don't see what separates this film from all the other Scooby-Doo direct to video films that have articles. Koala15 (talk) 14:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per meeting WP:NF through WP:GNG and commentary and analysis in independent sources. They should be added as citations, yes... but needing work does not equate to being non-notable. More, as the film became a comedy musical stage production, a section on THAT spin-off could be added to this article.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 18:28, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep . Maybe an online source discussing the film's production would be nice but I think it does well with WP:GNG for now. 和DITOR  E tails 18:56, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep MichaelQSchmidt has found proof it passes the general notability guidelines.  D r e a m Focus  19:16, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Changing my vote to Speedy Keep due to sources found. 和DITOR  E tails 02:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.