Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scooby-Doo! The Dread of Chicago


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted by  as a hoax. → Σ  τ  c. 05:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Scooby-Doo! The Dread of Chicago

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a bit of an emergency. After I prodded the article, the creator told me, basically, to stuff it because it's a proposal he's trying to make. Furthermore, he's asking that the article not be deleted until it gets blogged, so basically we should rush to delete it before it gets blogged. Delete.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 04:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete.  Hazard-SJ  ㋡   04:07, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as a blatant hoax, since the article makes it clear this does not exist. If its is felt this does not fall within CSD:G3, then this is a classic case of IAR where speedy deletion is justified to prevent the use of Wikipedia for purposes of perpetrating a falsehood. Sparthorse (talk) 04:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G3; tagged as such. It also doesn't help that the creator is violating WP:OWN, as well as making a slew of personal attacks in the edit summaries: . (AIV, here I come.)  Erpert  Who is this guy? 05:23, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per above → Σ  τ  c . 05:41, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as film described as a "possible" film, per WP:NFF. Until it becomes an actual film by starting principal photography (or the equivalent for animation), it shouldn't have a Wikipedia article. No sources have been provided to suggest that a redirect would be worthwhile. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.