Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scooby-Doo 3: Mystery Incorporated


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:V, possible hoax. j⚛e deckertalk 06:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Scooby-Doo 3: Mystery Incorporated

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Delete. Subject does not meet the criteria for notability for future films. A search for references to support the article came back with nothing. Only mention of the film was this Wikipedia article. Best regards,  Cindy  ( talk to me ) 22:52, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:36, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:36, 2 July 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete due to article not providing enough information to really determine the Scooby Doo topic. The similarly titled Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated was released in 2010, received kids choice award nominations, and decent coverage And a different topic referred to as Scooby-Doo 3 was being discussed in sources as early as 2004.  Combining the search terms into "Scooby-Doo 3: Mystery Incorporated" search gives NO results other than Wikipedia. The nominator is spot on. Lacking even verifiability of any Scooby-Doo movie being made for 2013 release, this article is at best WP:TOOSOON and at worst a possible hoax.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of verifiable sources. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. - Mailer Diablo 03:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as hoax. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:43, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Rob and Mchael rationales. Either way, this film has never been announced and surely a hoax, since no plans for it actually exist. — Hahc 21  15:32, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.