Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scooby Doo! Music Of The Vampire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. CSD A10 would normally apply, except that there is a valid target to redirect to. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:13, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Scooby Doo! Music Of The Vampire

 * – ( View AfD View log )

per WP:CBALL, film/series not released. mabdul 10:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yikes. While this is actually a real movie, it's far from being what this article makes it out to be. This is the title of a Scooby Doo movie that's releasing in March. The plot in this article is WAY off from what the movie is going to be about. As far as I can tell, this isn't a reboot of anything and is meant to fall in with the existing canon. This is just pure speculation. As far as keeping it goes, it isn't due out until March and there just aren't enough reliable sources to support an article at this time, especially since it's direct to video. At most this would be a redirect to Scooby-Doo. When the movie gets released we can see if there's enough buzz to warrant an article.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 19:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Comment. There's actually another article on Wikipedia for the actual movie here: Scooby-Doo! Music of the Vampire. It's being PRODed due to WP:CRYSTAL. This article that's up for deletion right now should be speedied for being a complete hoax, so I'm tagging it now.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 19:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete since there is a movie of this title, its not really a hoax, just deeply misguided. However, CSD:A10 (article that duplicates an existing article) does apply. Tagged as such. Sparthorse (talk) 20:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.