Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scooby doo and the toon tour of mysteries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete - falls far from basic notability requirements. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:21, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Scooby doo and the toon tour of mysteries

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not so sure what the notability of free promotional DVDs found inside boxes of cookies and cereal are, going to assume very low. This article seems broken in the worst way, cleanup is required as is verification through reliable sources and of course, notability establishment. I can't see a future in this article, even a merge sounds incredibly ludicrous. treelo radda  07:23, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  --  treelo  radda  08:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, questionable notability. Stifle (talk) 09:11, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:IINFO. This is not independently notable, and is more suitable for eBay. Mandsford (talk) 13:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Staxringold talkcontribs 15:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Google news has a bit on it. It seems to be more of a notable advertising thing than a DVD, though.  I added one ref.  I might work on this more, but I'm afraid it will be deleted and waste my time.  Otherwise, one could probably get a nice little DYK out of it. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 18:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps a "Did you know... that Wikipedia can advertise your business for only pennies a day?" :) Mandsford (talk) 14:00, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 20:56, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete echoing Mandsford, who is quite right. Eusebeus (talk) 20:02, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.