Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scooter Berry (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Sandstein  17:19, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Scooter Berry

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable. The creator of this page has a history of creating articles for every WVU athlete. While some are worthy of Wikipedia entries, this one is not. The subject is not noteworthy, and this is an orphan page. Timneu22 (talk) 12:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: The links to the article on this AfD were broken. They have now been fixed. Thanks ~ mazca  t 15:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note this is the second nomination. First nomination is here. Neier (talk) 12:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:54, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:54, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:58, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - Although there's no need for this, because we've already decided before that this was notable. John (talk) 21:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - John is the editor who has created all these troubled articles. Timneu22 (talk) 00:05, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Articles can be nominated multiple times for deletion. Timneu22 (talk) 00:05, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Whether it be futile or not, I see no reason for it if the article has already proven its notability. John (talk) 23:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:11, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't see good evidence of notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep All-Big East, there's your notability.--  Iamawesome  800  15:53, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This doesn't make someone notable. Should we list every All-BIG EAST women's volleyball players too? Timneu22 (talk) 19:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Women's volleyball is not football. In the US, there are four sports - the NFL, college football, college basketball, and everything else.  Any skill position starter for a major conference team in football is going to meet the general notability criterion of having multiple sources of information independent of the team/athlete. --B (talk) 20:08, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - despite efforts by the soccer crowd to redefine WP:ATHLETE in their own image, well-known starters for major conference teams are notable. --B (talk) 18:50, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.