Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scooterboy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  19:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Scooterboy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Long-time unreferenced article that contains what looks like pure original research. Biker Biker (talk) 15:54, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Yutsi Talk/  Contributions  15:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable and not enough sources to justify it-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  16:55, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Distinction without a difference. There's no need to make up a new slang word, and write a new Wikipedia article, every time subculture X fancies vehicle Y and hairstyle Z. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - Regardless of whether this Wikipedia article gets deleted, scooterboy is a real subculture. It's not just a made-up slang word, and it definitely isn't new.Spylab (talk) 03:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If it is real, and if you care about it (your comment implies that you might) then feel free to rescue the article by adding supporting references. I would like nothing more than to see another quality motorcycle-related article on Wikipedia. --Biker Biker (talk) 08:28, 2 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 16:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I haven't been able to find decent references online. That's why I only wrote "comment" instead of keep.Spylab (talk) 00:33, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note that offline references, like newspapers, books and magazines are fine as well, as long as they satisfy WP:RS Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:15, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.