Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scope creep (relationships)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Scope creep (relationships)
This article doesn't site it's sources. I cannot find any actual reference to this meaning in reality. I believe it to be a neologism. Carlif 22:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as a Seinfeldism at absolute best. BigHaz 23:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 10:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete no indication that it's entered the vernacular thoroughly enough to warrant an article. Take it to urbandictionary. -Elmer Clark 12:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Elmer Clark. User:Angr 15:16, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Elmer Clark. This article doesn't really have a purpose. -- Nish kid 64 00:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.