Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Score Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 23:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Score Group

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NCORP - sources don't allow to establish independent notability - routine business news merely prove that the company exists. — kashmīrī  TALK  18:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —  kashmīrī  TALK  18:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. —  kashmīrī  TALK  18:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —  kashmīrī  TALK  18:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. —  kashmīrī  TALK  18:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep I don't see, , or  as "routine business news merely prov[ing] that the company exists" and, moreover, I think WP:NCORP is met. Thincat (talk) 08:41, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The first link is a blatant advertisement, the next two are informercials – articles routinely created by the company's PR staff or PR agency. The 4th link is routine business news (takeover announcement). None offers WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:INDEPTH coverage. Phrases like "The biggest employer in Peterhead" may appear impressive, if not for the fact that Peterhead is a fishing town of barely 20,000 people. Delete. — kashmīrī  TALK  09:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete The company seems to be a specialized in some kind of engineering works. But it definitely does not meet to be an encyclopedic content. Does not pass WP:ORG. nirmal (talk) 07:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Misses WP:RS to qualify for WP:NCORP. Kieem trra (talk) 09:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough reliable sources.Jackattack1597 (talk) 16:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.