Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Score the Goals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:35, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Score the Goals

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This does not appear to meet the general notability criteria or the criteria for books. All the sources are either not reliable, not independent or provide insignificant coverage.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 08:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 08:21, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong keep - as author and as an inclusionist of more knowledge, for a more open Wikipedia. Article existing since July 2011. - AnakngAraw (talk) 00:32, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:ILIKEIT B  music  ian  07:08, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * See my response to this same argument at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classics Illustrated Special Issue: The United Nations  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 08:40, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 30 April 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete—Article is almost entirely sourced to UN or UN-committee websites, the pure definition of WP:SPS. Searching is complicated by it being a fairly common phrase, but the only relevant mentions I could find were similarly sourced back to the UN (reprints of press releases, etc.).  Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 17:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Google searches for ("score the goals" "millennium development") and for ("score the goals" "comic book") turned up no evidence of significant coverage by reliable independent sources.  The closest things that I found to such coverage were an article in the Manila Bulletin, whose style and content suggest that it's based on a press release; and a capsule review of a STG-based app at a Guardian blog.  To me, this clearly fails WP:GNG.  Ammodramus (talk) 01:32, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.