Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scornicești Solar Park by Power Clouds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 11:28, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Scornicești Solar Park by Power Clouds

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears promotional in nature, the single provided source is a primary one making me question the notability of this article. There appears to be a small group of new editors determined that the article is kept, thus forcing an AfD. Dolescum (talk) 14:16, 27 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - for being spam, and for the obnoxious behavior of the accounts behind the article. I might reconsider if some reliable sources are adduced. - Biruitorul Talk 16:58, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 27 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: I don't understand the difference between this topic and Scornicești Solar Park. Do we really need two articles? Vanjagenije (talk) 14:42, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * As far as I can tell, the authors of the newer article are claiming that there are two separate solar installations built by two different businesses at Scornicești. Dolescum (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - even if built by two companies, why can't we merge them? Bearian (talk) 19:46, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Good morning, I tried to avoid the page to be orphan by linking to the item in question on the pages of Scornicești district on Italian and in English wikipedia. As for neutrality, I'm available for advice and anything else to make the entry as close as possible to the policy of Wikipedia. Thank you for your attention — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giuseppe.catino (talk • contribs) 10:14, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

I acted to remove from text any sentences that could make one think of a spot. if you think the entry still contains periods disagree with the policies of wikipedia, you can signal to me and I will prompt remove them. Thank you. Giuseppe.catino (talk • contribs) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:02, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Scornicești Solar Park. If that is not possible, simply Delete as we cannot have two articles on the same topic. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 11:55, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as obvious spam from an SPA, and salt this title. Selective merge into Scornicești Solar Park, but do not redirect, as this is not plausible search term. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:02, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.