Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scosch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. - Philippe 19:23, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Scosch

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources, only one important contributor; probably a hoax, a misspelling of skosh. —Bkell (talk) 03:02, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Interesting article, obviously needs sources to validate this "interesting information" that may be a hoax. I would suggest we give it a little time to see if the author can provide some independent sources to support the information in the article. LakeBoater (talk) 03:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - Non-notable (zero g-hits) and extremely likely to be a hoax. The phrase "a scosch is about 3.1415 seconds" is ridiculous; I will not believe without some very good citations, that the ancient Indo-aryans had a unit of measure that is pi to the five significant figures in seconds. - Samuel  Tan  03:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Hoax, and not a very clever or funny one. Edison (talk) 03:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I like how ancient people could measure "pi" seconds. Very inventive and whimsically humorous. LonelyBeacon (talk) 05:08, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Yet an another hoax Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 13:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - absolute codswallop. JohnCD (talk) 16:26, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect as a misspelling of skosh. The wiktionary article or List_of_English_words_of_Japanese_origin are good targets.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  17:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.   —Fg2 (talk) 03:23, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to List_of_English_words_of_Japanese_origin or wiktionary as Fabrictramp suggested. Although it's fun humor. Fg2 (talk) 03:26, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.