Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scosche Industries (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Scosche Industries
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I hope we can get a full consensus with this obvious delete of a current article and I found links at News, Books, browser and Highbeam but simply nothing to suggest better improvement. I considered speedying as this is a speedy and PROD-worthy but it is good to have nomination in case of G4 later. Either way this has certainly not changed since starting in February 2009. Pinging the only still active users and  and maybe  (I'm not sure how active this one still is). SwisterTwister  talk  07:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:25, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:25, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:25, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete obvious promo article, not obviously notable. Per WP:COI "Do not edit Wikipedia in your own interests or in the interests of your external relationships.". (and if interested, I'm promoting my essay WP:BOGOF) Widefox ; talk 08:58, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Ping prev AfD folk: User:Gene93k User:RightCowLeftCoast User:MelanieN. Widefox ; talk 18:50, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually I pinged the most active and interested users I saw and I considered RightCowLeftCpast but they seem to be less active now and Gene93k hardly ever comments (mostly for pornography AfDs) and you'll notice I pinged MelanieN as it is. Cheers,  SwisterTwister   talk  20:30, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Oops, was assuming it was article editors, didn't even remember I was the nom on the prev AfD. Regards Widefox ; talk 21:10, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak delete The article has been unreferenced since its inception, and in a search I found no significant coverage about the company itself, so it fails WP:CORP. It is listed at Hoover's, but it is a bare listing; there is no information to base an article on. On the other hand, the company's products do get reviewed by credible sources; I found product reviews in PC Magazine, cnet, and the Huffington Post. This suggests that the company's products may be notable. So I am a bit on the fence. If the result here is keep, somebody ping me and I will add some of these references to the article. --MelanieN (talk) 21:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.