Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scot Young Research (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 01:32, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Scot Young Research
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I created this article after it had already been deleted, which is OK as I provided sources. However, I'm not sure that the subject of this article has been the subject of non-trivial, multiple reliable published sources. h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 18:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral - The 2 links there that show their profile on the group's site are not sources to establish notability, as they are members in the organization.  Weak hits in google news, so I'm not sure Corpx 04:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. That's interesting, more sources that could be added to establish notability. The thing is that this company's products are very widely used - I've seen them in shops, hotels, restaurants, offices, universities, almost everywhere.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 15:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete a minor supplier of cleaning supplies, and that they operate in several countries does not make them notable. Zero third party references.DGG (talk) 20:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable Harlowraman 23:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.