Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scotch, balls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.-- Wizardman 03:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Scotch, balls

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There are no links to this page and content does not seem meaningful or encyclopaedic GDon4t0 (talk to me...) 22:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - made up in a day junk (Bollocks!) &mdash; RevRagnarok  Talk Contrib 22:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Hoax. Balls. Croxley 23:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources, balls. Ab e g92 contribs 15:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. RJASE1 Talk  19:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This term has an appropriate place in the lexicon relating to the preparation of cocktails. There does appear a necessity to describe preparation which is essentially a hybrid between "neat" and "on the rocks".66.108.0.129 19:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I have heard this term used independently of its originators twice in the last two weeks. It was especially gratifying for me as I was in attendance on the evening of its genesis. Ironically, it took place at Gin Lane in Lower Manhattanand the depiction of events is spot on. As for its place in the popular lexicon, in the 6 months since this incident it has clearly demonstrated both the foothold(some bicoastal types were involved) and irreverence necessary to have some staying power.  As for its place on Wikipedia, terms like "who's your daddy" are an important part of the site's forward thinking, popular flavor.  My admittedly biased vote, is to keep it on. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Andrewmeany (talk • contribs).
 * You admit, then, that this is a neologism, since you were present at its "genesis" 6 months ago? To what "foothold" are you referring? -- Scientizzle 21:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. -- Scientizzle 21:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * With no verifiable sources, delete per WP:NEO. - Deor 20:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.