Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Blair


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 03:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Scott Blair

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not being completely certain about the notability of this one, I'm bringing it to a wider audience. (I've just reverted it from a totally non-notable hijack.) The only reference is a college profile, and either his career hasn't progressed to more notable areas, or no-one seems to care about it any more. Peridon (talk) 12:01, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  16:28, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable college football player. Subject does not satisfy the specific notability guideline for college athletes per WP:NCOLLATH (no major awards), or the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG (insufficient significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources).  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 02:50, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete college placekickers could accumulate coverage to pass WP:GNG but I cannot seem to find such coverage. If it were presented I would reconsider.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Blair did get lots of routine mentions in game coverage, Paul, just like most kickers. But the coverage is by no means "significant."  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 13:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Either way, I didn't find any. Perhaps if I looked harder.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not finding significant coverage in mainstream media sources.  My searches only turned up routine passing references. Cbl62 (talk) 00:49, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.