Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Boorman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was withdrawn after verifiable source of notability claim. `'mikka (t) 00:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Scott Boorman

 * del an average professor doing their job, no special notability. `'mikka (t) 21:35, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, notable as published author of title from Oxford University Press, so discussion of proftests isn't relevant. How about withdrawing it, mikka? Monicasdude 23:08, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * such garbage stubs must be deleted on spot as a punishment for lazy writers. `'mikka (t) 00:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, cleanup - Article is written like a pamphlet write up, but he's notable enough. &mdash; ßottesiηi  Tell me what's up 23:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.