Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Bradley (politician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Darrell Castle 2016 presidential campaign. Per Bearcat's argument re: NPOL, and Hut 8.5's assertion about how minor the party is, and no solid arguments refuting those, I find a reasonable consensus to not have a standalone. Per Hut's suggestion that he might be covered briefly at Darrell Castle 2016 presidential campaign, I am redirecting as a WP:ATD. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:32, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Scott Bradley (politician)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Has run for political office several times, has lost every race. Most refs are by summaries of candidates or election results, only one WP:RS about the candidate himself, yet hardly anything substantive mentioned in it.
 * William Allen Simpson (talk) 16:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as the nominee of a national political party for vice-president, it is very likely that a sufficient number of decent sources exist.--User:Namiba 20:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being a fringe party's candidate for vice-president is not an automatic notability freebie that exempts a person from having to get over WP:GNG on their sourcing — but per WP:MUSTBESOURCES, we do not keep an article just because somebody says they assume that quality sources probably exist: we only take into consideration sources that we know to exist because somebody has found and shown them. Bearcat (talk) 05:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC) William Allen Simpson (talk) 05:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete being on the presidential ticket of a minor political party doesn't indicate that sources will exist to satisfy the GNG, and in this case there are very few usable sources at all. seems to be as good as it gets. He can be covered briefly in Darrell Castle 2016 presidential campaign.  Hut 8.5  13:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Constitution Party vice pres. nominee, was a national party candidate who appeared on the ballot in multiple states. Wikipedia should be used as a reference point. Kingofthedead (talk) 20:49, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:CIRCULAR Wikipedia should never ever be used as a reference point.


 * Delete Interestingly appears to fail WP:GNG after a cursory before search. I have no problem if the information gets merged elsewhere. SportingFlyer  T · C  13:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.