Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Brook Road bridge over the Connecticut River


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not creating redirects because the current titles are unlikely search terms. However, if somebody wants to create redirects for shorter names, go ahead. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:10, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Scott Brook Road bridge over the Connecticut River

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not comply WP:Notability, just a pointless article about a small bridge crossing. Also there is no sites documenting it anywhere, making the articles unable to have references

I am also nominating the following related pages because they all are nearly the same:





JJBers (talk) 21:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Neutral As their creator, I'll just say that the Rt3 bridge is notable as the northern-most crossing of the longest river in New England. Do what you will. - Denimadept (talk) 00:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Reply, I've decided that the Route 3 bridge can not be put in the same argument as these, so I've removed it.--JJBers (talk) 10:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:03, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:03, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:03, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:03, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect as Scott Brook Road Bridge to List of crossings of the Connecticut River in line with WP:GEOFEAT as not enough sources to warrant a standalone article. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:22, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment, ditto with the other two. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly all three are not notable. No objection to redirects as above, as long as the articles are also moved to more concise titles (WP:title) MB 22:17, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Close, I think it's been decided that this is just a redirect. I'll wait for another 12 hours (12:00, 10-1-16, UTC), but if nothing happens, I close this, move the page, and redirect it.&mdash; JJBers (talk) 00:23, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I wouldn't even bother with a redirect. The structure has no notability whatsoever. And Adoil Descended (talk) 01:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another load of NN bridges. Not worth a redirect either as nobody will ever search for or link to these titles. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:03, 5 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.