Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott D. Stockert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:30, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Scott D. Stockert

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Arrested for trying to kidnap Obamas dog. Believe that this is a case of BLP1E. Otherwise non notable person Gbawden (talk) 11:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  12:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  12:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as per WP:BLP1E and WP:BLPCRIME.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:20, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - per WP:GNG. This person got plenty of news coverage world wide for this event. Like it or not, this is notable, the article is crap but that can be fixed and we do not delete articles based on article quality.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * delete clearly WP:BLP1E. significant coverage doesn't apply if it's about one event concerning a person. LibStar (talk) 15:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:BLP1E of an alleged criminal, with no preexisting notability for anything else besides the 1E, and who has not yet been convicted in a court of law. Per WP:PERP, this kind of thing is not an appropriate topic to rush into on the basis of the immediate blip of coverage — if and when he's convicted, an article might become appropriate (though I still suspect not, as I'm hard-pressed to see this ever becoming anything more than a very minor footnote in the annals of history), but it's definitely inappropriate for us to keep an article about him today. Bearcat (talk) 22:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.