Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Ferreira


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I will userfy the article upon request. MelanieN (talk) 00:35, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Scott Ferreira

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable. This amounts to an advertisement for his various non-notable projects.  DGG ( talk ) 20:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep! not notable? interviews in huffington post, The State Press, AZ Business Magazine, and Forbes.--27century (talk) 20:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  02:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  02:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  02:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Draft and userfy perhaps as he may be best known for the company which I've also suggested drafting and userfying at Articles for deletion/MySocialCloud. SwisterTwister   talk  05:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete No significant coverage of this person (as a person) in independent, reliable sources. I am sorry,, but interviews are not independent sources and therefore do not contribute to notability. No objection to userfying and resubmission if truly independent sources are provided. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  04:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:55, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.