Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Fuller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. A Train take the 17:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Scott Fuller

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod expired, but article has too much claim of notability (especially in history), for me to be willing to deleted on a prod of "Unnotable 23-year-old private citizen, does not appear to meet WP:BIO". The article doesn't show that he meets WP:BIO, but I'm not convinced anyone has really tried. Last paragraph has troubles with WP:SELF, but that is not a basis for deletion. GRBerry 15:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't really appear to be that notable to be honest, and doesn't pass WP:BIO. Lacks any reliable sources as well. Jayden54 15:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - may be notable as he works for a major radio station, but needs more reliable sources to demonstrate recognition of notability. Walton monarchist89 19:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - very marginally notable, maybe, but as Walton monarchist89 mentions, not enough sourcing to be sure. Also, from the last paragraph, doesn't sound like he's too happy about having an article (not that that would be a reason to delete). delldot | talk 20:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I agree with what has been said above, but draw the conclusion that notability is there. The lack of sources is casue for research not deletion.  --Kevin Murray 21:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not really notable as a radio personality or journalist. Certainly no WP:RS compliance demonstrated. --Dhartung | Talk 22:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete far far far below standards of notability. Where are secondary sources talking about this person, who comments on sports on a radio show once a month? Pete.Hurd 23:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless properly sourced by end of this AfD Alf photoman 23:19, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 13:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.