Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Gall/Museum of vandalism/Exhibit 5

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 01:45, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

User:Scott Gall/Museum of vandalism/Exhibit 5
nazi-page --141.53.194.251 07:10, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep this. I don't think stuff should be "stolen" from "museums." I'm a good girl. Besides, can you actually read German or did you just recognise the word Hitler? [[User:NazismIsntCool|NazismIsntCool/sig

Nazism  isn't   cool ]] 3 July 2005 09:48 (UTC)
 * Keep. Same reasons as NazismIsntCool. I'm the curator of this museum, so don't go planning thefts. It's illegal to steal from museums. Scott Gall July 3, 2005 09:50 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's not stealing because we're using a wiki. I think the page is a bit over the top. 218.101.117.25 3 July 2005 09:57 (UTC)
 * Keep. A museum is just there for showing stuff. That's what the museums in London have - a lot of stuff just for show. I wouldn't steal from them, would I? Barely There 4 July 2005 09:52 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm not a Nazi, but this stuff is not there to entertain or raise suspicion - it's just for show. Besides, it's illegal to steal from museums in Kazakhstan. HellRaiser 4 July 2005 09:54 (UTC)
 * Keep. Petru is right - this stuff is just for show. It's to show people how bad vandals can get. Jesus Lover 4 July 2005 09:57 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's his userpage, he should be able to put whatever the hell he wants on it. Isn't that the point of userpages? Cyclone49 04:26, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, almost whatever you want... there are limits though but this doesn't really cross the line. Sasquatch&#08242;&#08596;Talk&#08596;Contributions
 * Speedy keep its in his "Museum of Vandalism" so its just to show what VANDALS are doing. Sasquatch&#08242;&#08596;Talk&#08596;Contributions 04:58, July 20, 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. Scott Gall has his anti-vandalism page, but not to glorify vandalism! Peter Ellis 05:14, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Who cares what goes on in User space, anyway? Documenting the range of vandalism possibilities is what allows this stuff to be boring, old news.  If we Delete it, then we allow it to be original again by repeating it.  Eric 08:29, 20 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Emphatic Keep james gibbon  12:18, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, as a record of vandalism, although there's no need to be zany about it. Binadot 21:34, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * No reason to get worked up about, but I'd say this is an entirely inappropriate use of userspace. Scott Gall has already stated on his page that he'll move it to Wikicities, I think that's a lot better. From his main museum page I infer that he's doing this to prove he'll make a good admin; I'm not convinced that it actually proves such. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 12:33, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * keep becuase it is in userspace Yuckfoo 21:49, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. You DO know Scott Gall isn't actually promoting that message, right?  Almafeta 02:50, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.