Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Goodson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Scott Goodson

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BLP with no effective reference. UPE article. What refs are there are interviews+lots company stuff. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO   scope_creep Talk  00:36, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. I do find amusement in seeing what sort of media coverage the average CEO can buy. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 02:57, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Canada,  and New York.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neither companies nor their CEOs are automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and instead have to pass WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH on their sourceability — but this is referenced almost entirely to a mixture of primary sources and marketing bumf that isn't support for notability at all, with the only hits that come from real GNG-worthy media being glancing namechecks of his existence or Q&A interviews in which he's talking about himself rather than third-party reliable source coverage about him. Bearcat (talk) 18:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: Earwig returns a 73% copyvio percentage to this website. This is copied from Wikipedia and is not a copyright violation. I have removed the copyvio tag from the article and placed Backwardscopy on the talk page. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 18:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no evidence of notability Almeida Fernando (talk) 09:33, 4 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.