Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Gosar (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Cracked.  Sandstein  17:53, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Scott Gosar
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Individual of questionable notability. The only external link provided looks like a personal web page, and the only user to add any content to the article shares their name with the article itself.  role player 17:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: the first nomination for deletion was over a year ago - I am running this again as I don't know if the individual in question has got more notable in that time. --  role player 17:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity piece for utterly non-notable person. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 17:48, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, and obviously WP:COI issues as well. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 17:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * COI is not an issue that requires deletion when there's no fluff language in the article. - Mgm|(talk) 19:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Cracked. Was editor of notable magazine, but there's not enough information to write a separate entry for this man. - Mgm|(talk) 19:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment = I've found another reference for the article, an interview with Gosar in a Reno newspaper. This may or may not make him notable.  I don't know, so I'm only commenting instead of recommending deletion or keeping.  :)  Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 23:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  20:24, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  StarM  04:16, 10 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak delete I cleaned up the article. What's left is thin. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:57, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The guy was published in well established humor magazines. It's no longer a vanity piece. It would be okay to keep it, but if the consensus is delete, I think that's reasonable. I did clean it up and then add back in some stuff.ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * PS my nominating opinion is that it should be deleted, just in case that was unclear. --  role player 11:18, 10 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - none of the given sources are said to be reliable to establish notability. Publishing a magazine does not satisfy notability either. Dekisugi (talk) 08:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect following Mgm. (Emperor (talk) 20:01, 12 November 2008 (UTC))


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.