Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Kaufer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Scott Kaufer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Small time producer, no real coverage and claim of being "head of comedy" at WB is unsourced and I can find no evidence that it's even a notable position. Praxidicae (talk) 00:11, 20 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:26, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 15:15, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 15:15, 20 January 2019 (UTC)


 * KeepThe subject in question has a career spanning 21 years in the film and television industry. He has written at least 28 hours of prime-time television and produced at least 117 hours of primetime television. Furthermore, "head of comedy" is clearly sourced on the page, see "Syd., Field, (2005). Selling a screenplay : the screenwriter's guide to Hollywood. New York: Bantam Dell. ISBN 9780307570642. OCLC 741176953". A simple google search will show that "Head of Comedy" or also called "Head of Comedy Development" is a very notable position, especially at a gigantic media company such as Warner Bros. Scotchisgood77 (talk) 01:24, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment is this a comment or vote above?? Loved150 (talk) 01:12, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment not sure if I’ve formatted it correctly, but that was a comment and a vote to not delete. It doesnt serve the public at all to delete this page. Only the egos of overzealous editors who enjoy deleting others’ work. But that’ll be the last I’ll comment on it. I’ll leave this in the admins’ hands. Scotchisgood77 (talk) 02:10, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete lacks the quality indepth sourcing needed to pass GNG. television writers and producers are not default notable, and mere large number of works do not give notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:14, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sheldybett (talk) 00:14, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources listed in the article are mentions of Kaufer, no in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG Aurornisxui (talk) 17:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.