Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Keadle (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Scott Keadle
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This BLP does not meet GNG for WP:POLITICIAN or WP:BIO. Only elected office is hyper-local county commissioner which would not normally qualify as notable outwith exceptional circumstances.

Somewhat of a perennial candidate, but given that they generally failed to get past primaries (much less general elections) and lack the WP:SIGCOV that would be needed for a perennial candidate to be notable (c.f. Howling Laud Hope or Count Binface), I don't believe they're over the line.

Promo/Peacock in "Community and family" section implies originally written by someone associated with his campaigns. That can be fixed/rewritten, but he's not notable to start with.

A previous AfD in 2013 came to no consensus, seemingly based on currency/recency of elections. But 12 years later I don't see that any enduring notability has been demonstrated. Hemmers (talk) 10:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Conservatism, North Carolina,  and West Virginia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  10:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable county commissioner/congressional candidate. No real claim to notability BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 08:08, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete agree not notable lower office-holder and frequent candidate. Shrikesong (talk) 06:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.