Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Klein (bodybuilder)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Veinor (talk to me) 23:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Scott Klein (bodybuilder)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete Not notable for Wikipedia consideration. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable.  Atyndall93  |  talk   01:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- Per those above; fails WP:NOTABILITY. Mizu onna sango15 / 水 女 珊瑚15  02:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - I put in the stub in hopes that it would get fleshed out a little more. I didn't have Klein's exact competition history, and didn't say anything about his being one of a series of probable steroid-related deaths, but thought someone else might be able to flesh out those aspects.  In any case, I think the article is in decent compliance with the notability guideline for athletes:WP:ATHLETE  RivGuySC (talk) 04:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep There's enough there to possibly indicate some semblance of notability - if the stub can be fleshed out, sure. Otherwise, delete. Minkythecat (talk) 12:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: The only national media attested is the cover of a magazine as, we assume, an anonymous model.  The various products released don't do it.  After all, we get loads of bands who "release" things, but we ask that there be some serious sales or national review, so I'm not getting the sense that this person is clearly over the line.  It's true that it's possible that he's notable, but we can only assess what we see.  Utgard Loki (talk) 17:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.