Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Koziol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:42, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Scott Koziol

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Bassist-for-hire who has played with some notable artists but does not appear to be notable on his own. Fails WP:MUSIC. TheJazzDalek (talk) 14:22, 1 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —TheJazzDalek (talk) 14:24, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete on notability grounds IJA (talk) 14:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - He has performed on a work of media which is notable, and as such there has been some coverage of him. It's tenuous but he appears to be notable. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Please post links to any media coverage of substance that you've discovered, I couldn't find any. Performing on a notable work of media is not one of the criteria at WP:MUSIC, and does not make a person notable. TheJazzDalek (talk) 17:17, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:36, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Added a bit to the article but have to agree with the nom, there just isn't anything out there to establish his own notability.  Perhaps in the future he'll record his own stuff or become a permanent member of some other band. J04n(talk page) 03:48, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per the lack of reliable sources. A Google News Archive search does not return relevant results. Per Verifiability and Biographies of living persons, a biography of a living person sourced to only unreliable sources should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 01:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.