Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Levy (actor) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 06:34, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Scott Levy (actor)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Vanispamcruftisement. This Autobiography is a puff piece advertising an actor who lacks significant roles in multiple notable productions. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:37, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. A search brought up absolutely zero usable references aside from an interview that I'm not sure meets reliability guidelines. Even if it did, this was the only reference I could find for Levy and we need more than one reference to establish notability. As far as WP:NACTOR goes, Levy has not held any significant or memorable roles that would meet criteria number 1, he doesn't seem to have any sort of fan/cult following per criteria number 2, and he hasn't made any unique/prolific/innovative contributions to his field. He's pretty much "just another actor". This barely squeaked through on the old guidelines but it absolutely fails the current ones.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:41, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Can't find any references.  Seems to have largely been written by its subject, which means not even 1 other WP user thinks he merits an article. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 18:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The "keep" of six years ago seems to have been based upon his body of work tweaking at WP:ENT. Perhaps an argummet might still be made that he does, but without having reliable sources speaking about him in any detail, we have a failed BLP.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:32, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.