Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Malcomson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 22:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Scott Malcomson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An individual who fails notability, whether you look at it from a GNG or NPOL standpoint. The sources available are primary and it appears the article, particularly the intro, is copied from the lone reference--a big no-no around here. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 20:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - I'm not convinced that he fails notability criteria, but there is little claim of notability in the article, plus the referencing is woefully inadequate at present. Deb (talk) 20:26, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  20:39, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  20:39, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  20:39, 6 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Did either of you look for sources covering him and his work? FloridaArmy (talk) 21:46, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are referring to the sources you added -- links to groups he is directly associated with, the company that published his book, and passing mentions -- then yes; those are not indicators of notability and, in fact, show just how unnotable he is.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 00:49, 7 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Noting that article looks prima facie notable, a former foreign editor at the New York Times with a long list of books, I started by searching the title of one of his books One Drop of Blood: The American Misadventure of Race my search here: . Right on the first page there are enough reviews in notable publications to carry him past WP:AUTHOR.  User:FloridaArmy asks a very reasonable question.  Keep and tag for sourcing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 02:04, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep E.M.Gregory said it better than I could - book reviews come up immediately from well-respected sources like The Economist, and I even searched the title of a different book (Splinternet). SportingFlyer  talk  04:18, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep A simple search turned up material that provides the reliable and verifiable sources that establish clear evidence of notability. Alansohn (talk) 21:32, 7 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.