Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott McDowell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. sufficient consensus for deletion after the relisting.  DGG ( talk ) 08:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Scott McDowell
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

DeleteThe article has no independent reliable sources and does not appear to meet WP: Notability guidelines.--Regeek (talk) 06:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:17, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete. Neither the subject nor his enterprises appear to be notable. What I find on the web is the same as the references in the article: primary sources, sales sites, blogs, press releases, Youtube. Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:NOTPROMO. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:01, 27 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. The subject does not appear to be notable. The article reads more like a billboard for advertising an enterprise insignificant and not worthy of a WP article. The references provided do not establish WP:Notability and even worse break every guideline set forth in WP:NOTPROMO--Regeek (talk) 15:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.