Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott R. MacIver


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 20:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Scott R. MacIver

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Business person with no credible claim per WP:BIO. There are 2 sources in the article and both are trivial mentions in an industry magazine's "Forty under forty" list as well as being named a "David Rockefeller Fellow". My opinion is that this article should be Deleted.--Isotope23 17:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable.  I am also concerned that this article, and articles related to this one, have been added in bulk by someone who appears to have a business relationship with the subjects of the articles.  LastChanceToBe 21:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable. Google News Archives has more information on a Scott MacIver in ... Scotland. --Dhartung | Talk 22:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete, notable accomplishments.User:Spencerpet — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.56.150.17 (talk • contribs)

abstain After a conversation with the author of the page on the talk page of a deleted article I'm thinking the author is the subject in violation of WP:Auto. I don't want the author to continue feeling like I am personally attacking them hence my abstain vote. --Hansonc 18:16, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete unless verifiable references i.a.w. WP:BIO are included by end of this AfD Alf photoman 23:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Perhaps it is better to allow someone else to write an article Re: Scott R. MacIver. Do what you will.

Addhoc 13:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above searches - only a single mention in the "AdWeek New England" isn't sufficient for WP:BIO... Addhoc 13:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. He is CEO of a company that itself is apparently not notable (only 1 other search hit in WP and 100 non-company-site hits in Google). If that and a reference in a publication are his only claims to fame, in my mind he's not notable (yet). - grubber 16:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.