Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Ragsdale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 11:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Scott Ragsdale

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Proposal for deletion due to lack of content which would tie this article to anything meaningful except for the naseba article. IMHO reads very much like a personal description on a homepage or such. piksi (talk) 19:51, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Only real references are from the same small newspaper. Non-notable, non-verifiable.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:58, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable Clubmarx (talk) 01:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, agree with others that this appears not to be a significant or notable businessman — even if the company is notable, he doesn't inherit notability simply by being its founder, CEO, etc. Nyttend (talk) 03:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The requirements for WP:BIO articles is non-trivial coverage from multiple third party sources.  JBsupreme (talk) 03:45, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.