Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Savitt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) -- Dane 2007  talk 00:28, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Scott Savitt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

not enough reliable sources to establish notability per WP:JOURNALIST. Just mentions and written articles posted by the subject could be found online. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:43, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Media-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:44, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep This is a horribly written article, at times not even showing basic understanding that mentions to the lives of real people should always be in the past tense unless you are saying something about them that applies when you are writing. However there are 2 reliable, 3rd party sources about him, the San Francisco Chronicle article about his leaving China and the National Geographic article on 10 books to travel the world with that includes a book by Savitt. This article needs lots of improvement in the way it is written. However Savitt does pass our notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I have cleaned up the article and removed some copyrighted text. --TheDomain (talk) 07:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.