Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Weinberg (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 17:50, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Scott Weinberg
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The article, which appears to be largely or perhaps exclusively the creation of the subject and related parties, appears to be essentially promotional in nature. While the subject does have a local radio show (with internet syndication), there is a marked scarcity of reliable 3d party sources discussing the subject, and for that reason the article appears to fail the basic tests of WP:BIO. A PROD template was quickly removed by an anon editor, without explanation or improvement to the article. A prior article by the same name was deleted in 2005 but it is not clear that the earlier article concerned this same individual. JohnInDC (talk) 02:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Additional note - The IP editor did subsequently add a couple of references, not really on point and only one of them independent of the subject, but my prior observation that the editor did not improve the article at all is no longer true. JohnInDC (talk) 02:19, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable. Although I did not read them all, the sources I did read quoted Mr. Weinberg or made passing mention of him as an attorney in a criminal case. This does not seem to add up WP:SIGCOV. Cnilep (talk) 07:24, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. This reads too much like an uncritical CV.  More critical references needed.Squareanimal (talk) 10:35, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.