Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottish Formula Ford Championship


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 17:10, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Scottish Formula Ford Championship

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Amateur racing series with no apparent notability. No references provided, and Google provides nothing outside of mentions from the club racing community. QueenCake (talk) 22:44, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 12:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 12:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 12:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Cybervoron (talk) 18:33, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 04:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The article hadn’t been written well, there are some large gaps in terms of content and there were no references included. There are however numerous instances of the events, the championship and the champions being mentioned outside of the club racing community. I have made a raft of changes to try and show the notability of this championship, as shown by coverage in reliable secondary sources. Although it is an amateur championship, it is notable for having had several champions and competitors who have gone on to race in other professional events, including Formula one. I see that improvement notices had been applied some time back, but hadn’t been acted upon. The article hadn't been linked in to other pages or relevant wikiprojects. At the very least the content from this article could be merged to the Knockhill Racing Circuit article but I think that there is enough reason to keep it in its own right. It could, of course, benefit from the attention of editors who have specialist knowledge. Drchriswilliams (talk) 18:10, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 10:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Drchriswilliams. Dalliance (talk) 12:34, 19 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep as expanded, it's a much better article now than at the time of nomination. ✤ Fosse   8 ✤  16:38, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.