Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottish Ju Jitsu Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was even with brand new users not factored in, still no consensus, default action is keep. Babajobu 01:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Scottish Ju Jitsu Association
Delete non-notable, self written article (see older revisions for use of the word "we") Howabout1 16:46, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep hell if we can have articles on dumb cartoons I dont see why this one shouldnt stay. Jcuk 18:40, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, because it's nn, and voting keep just to make a WP:POINT isn't helpful here. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 19:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per above -- † Ðy§ep§ion † Speak your mind 19:55, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is a logical extension of the links section in the Ju Jitsu page, and is therefore seems notable enough. In fact, it would be nice if the other links in that page all had pages in them. Dbol 21.10, 11 February 2006 (BST) ''' (User's 2nd edit.)
 * Keep If this article should be deleted because its nn, then the other Ju Jitsu association articles should be deleted as well, they are equaly self written and self promoting. At least this one is short. JBC240, 11 February 1751 (MST) (User's first edit.) 
 * Keep Yeh I aggree with Jcuk, its notable enough for its context. There is nothing wrong with this article that couldn't be solved by improving the layout, and adding some more information Johndzl, 12 February 0204 (GMT) (User's first edit.) 

WHAT IS A WP:POINT? COULD SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN WITHOUT JARGON WHY YOU DON'T LIKE THIS PAGE? &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dougmarkham (talk &bull; contribs) 2006-02-11 12:45:35.

WP:POINT, is wikipedia's policy aganst editing to make a point, Jcuk was voting to prove his point that if articles on cartoons can stay, many things should. Click on the link if you're still curious. We think the page should be deleted because it it isn't big or important enough for wikipedia. If you have any more questions feel free to use my talk page. Also, please sigh you're posts with four tildes. LIke this ~. Howabout1 20:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep I think we're being a bit racist here! This article is no worse that our 'American Judo & Jujitsu Federation' article!! Why are you guys picking on Scotland? If the AJJF, the Katabami Ryu Ju-Jitsu, the AJJIF people and the Sanuces Ryu school can have a nn page, then why not the SJJA? ZaccSchol, 11 February  21:17:14 (EST) (User's first edit.) 


 * Keep I sure as hell know what goin on here people, Howabout1 is all sour grapes because he don't wanna admit that his English BJJA has lost its governing body status over Scotland (hehehe). I got friends over there, I know whats goin down! Be a grown up Howabout1, and let the Scottish have their webpage ;-) No wonder alot of folk hate the English StrzNStrips, 11 February  21:32:54 (EST) (User's first edit.) 
 * Delete as an article created in violation of WP:POINT, the point in question being that paragraph in all caps at the top of the article. Beyond that it's pretty much nn-club, its website is the right place for this info. Oh, and I generally vote to delete on meatpuppet-infested AFD debated anyway. Stifle 23:31, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, important to coverage of Jujitsu in Scotland, helps to fight bias against "meatpuppet infestations". Kappa 18:21, 16 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.